Democrats under pressure to pass electoral reform

WashingtonDemocrats are determined to change Senate rules to meet ambitious reforms to the electoral system, arguing that the impact of Donald Trump’s lies on the 2020 vote requires extraordinary measures.

In fiery speeches and interviews, President Joe Biden and Democratic legislative leaders affirmed that Congress must pass a series of reforms, a year after its January 6 takeover. Senate Republicans have repeatedly blocked those initiatives, which they describe as an “attempt to accumulate more power” by Democrats. He warned that the consequences of such changes could be dire for Democrats when Republicans are in a majority in Congress.

Republican Senator John Thune said, “Even the largest majority eventually become a minority.”

Trump’s false claims that his election was stolen not only fueled early past revolt, according to Democrats, but also launched a Republican campaign to pass state laws that would make voting more difficult. And makes it easier in some cases. Election.

The Democratic proposals represent the largest electoral reform in a generation. They would remove a number of barriers designed to ensure clean elections, reduce the impact of funding, and limit manipulation of legislative districts. Uniform electoral rules would be established for the entire country that would override measures passed by Republicans at the state level. In states with a history of discrimination, the authority to oversee the law will also be returned to the Department of Justice.

Many Democrats believe the time has come to act decisively in what they see as a great fight for civil rights. Changing Senate laws in early 2022 is perhaps the last chance for Democrats to counter Republican-pushing measures in several states ahead of year-end midterm elections, in which Republicans could gain control of two legislative chambers. .

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Friday, “If Republicans continue to manipulate House rules to prevent us from protecting our democracy, the Senate should debate and consider changing those rules.” ”

It’s unclear what Democrats can do without the support of the elusive Sen. Democrats and Republicans are tied with 50-50 seats in the Senate, and Democrats can carry out their projects with Vice President Kamala Harris’s deciding vote. As long as Munchkin votes with them. However, West Virginia senators are sometimes reluctant to do so.

So far he has not made any commitments. On several occasions he has stated that he is not in favor of reducing the votes needed to reduce the “filibuster” from 60 to 50, as he calls for interception maneuvers. Another Democratic senator, Kirsten Cinemas, is opposed to doing the same.

Unless that resource is exhausted, it will be nearly impossible for Democrats to complete their projects.

Schumer scheduled a series of polls for next week, coinciding with Martin Luther King Jr. Day, in an effort to highlight Republican opposition to initiatives he says are too popular.

However, Manchin said last week that “I’m not going to say ‘yes’ or ‘no’ because I don’t know which resolutions will be voted on.” He insisted that in the past he had supported some changes to the electoral rules.

Republicans claim that calling for a January 6 uprising is outrageous. They point out that the electoral laws were created before the rebellion and include measures sponsored by liberal sectors that do nothing to counter the weaknesses exposed by Trump’s attempts to ignore the outcome of the elections.

Senate Republican Bloc leader Mitch McConnell said, “It’s in very bad taste that some of our allies want to call for a January 6th anniversary to achieve their goals.” “The fact that violent criminals have violated laws does not give Democratic senators a free stone to flout Senate laws.”

The new efforts to reform electoral laws come at a time when the government’s agenda is stuck in Congress, where Munchkin’s protests have stalled major social and environmental projects that have been indefinitely postponed.

Civil rights activists are dismayed and say they have missed out on several months. They see the measures promoted by Republicans as subtle ways to restrict the vote, discouraging the participation of black voters, a traditional Democratic stronghold.