What is the cladding scandal and how does the government want to fix it?

Tea

The security of skyscrapers has been under scrutiny ever since a massive fire at Grenfell Tower killed dozens of people.

The government has now resolved to take fresh action to highlight the burden on the lessees, who have been facing eye-watering costs for the reform work so far.

It added that developers will not hesitate to impose a tax to kill those responsible for the dangerous cladding if companies do not voluntarily take steps to fix security flaws.

Here’s a look at the plans so far:

Grenfell Tower (Steve Parsons / PA) , PA Wire

A spotlight was cast on the use of flammable materials in the construction of high-rise buildings after the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017 killed 72 people.

Many leaseholders are facing potentially catastrophic bills after discovering that the cladding on their homes could be dangerous.

Some have been hit with costs in excess of £100,000 to replace allegedly unsafe materials or to pay for so-called “wake watches”, where someone is employed to patrol a building to investigate a fire. goes.

– What action has been taken so far?

In February 2021, the government announced a multi-billion-pound package to ensure that no lessees in high-rise blocks in England face charges for removing cladding.

The measures were intended to protect those who have homes in high-rise buildings.

They mean that lessees in blocks higher than 18 m (59 ft) in height can obtain a grant to replace unprotected cladding.

For those who have houses in small buildings, so far the case has been different.

For blocks between 11 m and 18 m (36 ft and 59 ft), the government said in February that it would introduce a “long-term, low-interest” loan scheme, under which “any lessee at any time in a month”. Will not pay more than £50. Removal of unprotected cladding”.

But Michael Gove, who later handled Housing Brief, said in November: “I’m still unhappy with the theory of leaseholders paying at all, no matter what a plan is in capping their costs.” How effective may or may not hit them too hard at any one time.”

Speaking to lawmakers on Monday, he said: “We will also ensure that those who have benefited and continue to benefit from the sale of unsafe buildings and construction products, take full responsibility for their actions and work to fix things.” should pay for.

,